Cyberhaven vs Trend Micro Integrated DLP

A side-by-side comparison on deployment model, data residency, licensing basis and security coverage. Structural facts are verifiable against vendor documentation; the scored dimensions are our assessment.

CH

Cyberhaven

Cyberhaven

7.1

Average across eight dimensions

Deployment
SaaS only
Licensing
Per user
Time to value
Medium
Segment
Mid-market / enterprise
G2
4.5 (18)
TM

Trend Micro Integrated DLP

TrendAI (Trend Micro)

7.2

Average across eight dimensions

Deployment
Hybrid
Licensing
Add-on per endpoint
Time to value
Medium
Segment
Mid-market / enterprise
G2
—

Score by dimension

Dimension CH TM
Data residency control 3 6.5
Pricing value 6 7.5
Detection accuracy 8.5 7
Response speed 8 7.5
Ease of setup 7.5 7.5
Management UX 8.5 7.5
Integration depth 7.5 7.5
Security coverage 8 7

What the comparison says

Cyberhaven is SaaS only and Trend Micro Integrated DLP is hybrid. Where your obligations dictate residency, that difference tends to settle the choice before any score is read.

Cyberhaven licenses on per user, Trend Micro Integrated DLP on add-on per endpoint. Neither bills on data volume, so the comparison is about what each licence includes rather than how much you send it.

Cyberhaven leads on classification, management UX and channel coverage. Trend Micro Integrated DLP leads on residency and pricing value.

Cyberhaven

  • +Traces data lineage rather than only matching content, so it catches transformed and renamed files.
  • +Materially fewer false positives than pattern-matching approaches.
  • +Investigation workflow shows the full path a file travelled.
  • −Cloud-delivered with no self-hosted deployment.
  • −Younger vendor with a smaller install base and less independent analyst coverage.

Best for Organisations where intellectual property leaves via transformation rather than obvious copying.

Watch out Assess vendor maturity and support depth alongside the technology.

Trend Micro Integrated DLP

  • +Adds DLP to an existing Trend Micro deployment without a new vendor.
  • +Reasonable cost where the endpoint agent is already installed.
  • +Good regional presence and support across Southeast Asia.
  • −Capability is narrower than dedicated DLP platforms.
  • −Best value only realised if you already run Trend Micro endpoint protection.

Best for Existing Trend Micro customers adding basic data protection.

Watch out Standalone, this would not make a DLP shortlist on capability alone.

Evaluate nPro yourself

Free for up to 30 agents, no time limit, no credit card. Deploys on your own infrastructure in minutes.

Read the documentation Talk to an engineer All 16 platforms →

More Cyberhaven comparisons

CH vs NP CH vs FP CH vs SY CH vs MP CH vs TX CH vs DG CH vs NS CH vs ZS CH vs PP CH vs EP CH vs SF CH vs NF CH vs GT CH vs GW

More Trend Micro Integrated DLP comparisons

TM vs NP TM vs FP TM vs SY TM vs MP TM vs TX TM vs DG TM vs NS TM vs ZS TM vs PP TM vs EP TM vs SF TM vs NF TM vs GT TM vs GW

Data last verified 2026-10-06. nPro publishes this comparison. Where nPro appears as one of the platforms listed, its card is marked and its scores are our own assessment. Third-party review scores are sourced from public vendor profiles. Structural facts are verifiable against each vendor's documentation: deployment model, licensing basis and residency.