Cyberhaven vs Google Workspace DLP
A side-by-side comparison on deployment model, data residency, licensing basis and security coverage. Structural facts are verifiable against vendor documentation; the scored dimensions are our assessment.
Cyberhaven
Cyberhaven
7.1
Average across eight dimensions
- Deployment
- SaaS only
- Licensing
- Per user
- Time to value
- Medium
- Segment
- Mid-market / enterprise
- G2
- —
Google Workspace DLP
6.9
Average across eight dimensions
- Deployment
- SaaS only
- Licensing
- Workspace Enterprise tier
- Time to value
- Fast
- Segment
- SMB / mid-market / enterprise
- G2
- —
Score by dimension
| Dimension | CH | GW |
|---|---|---|
| Data residency control | 3 | 2.5 |
| Pricing value | 6 | 8 |
| Detection accuracy | 8.5 | 7 |
| Response speed | 8 | 7.5 |
| Ease of setup | 7.5 | 8.5 |
| Management UX | 8.5 | 8 |
| Integration depth | 7.5 | 7 |
| Security coverage | 8 | 6.5 |
Cyberhaven
- +Traces data lineage rather than only matching content, so it catches transformed and renamed files
- +Materially fewer false positives than pattern-matching approaches
- +Investigation workflow shows the full path a file travelled
- −Cloud-delivered with no self-hosted deployment
- −Younger vendor with a smaller install base and less independent analyst coverage
Best for Organisations where intellectual property leaves via transformation rather than obvious copying
Watch out Assess vendor maturity and support depth alongside the technology
Google Workspace DLP
- +Included with Workspace Enterprise tiers at no additional licence cost
- +Native coverage of Gmail, Drive and Chat with nothing to deploy
- +Straightforward rules that a generalist administrator can manage
- −Covers only Google Workspace — no endpoint, network or third-party SaaS coverage
- −Inspection happens in Google's cloud with no residency alternative
Best for Organisations whose sensitive data lives entirely inside Google Workspace
Watch out Scope is the limitation, not the quality — anything outside Workspace is invisible
Evaluate nPro yourself
Free for up to 99 agents, no time limit, no credit card. Deploys on your own infrastructure in minutes.
Other comparisons
Data last verified 2026-09-16. nPro publishes this comparison. Where nPro appears as one of the platforms listed, its card is marked and its scores are our own assessment. Third-party review scores are sourced from public vendor profiles. Structural facts — deployment model, licensing basis, residency — are verifiable against each vendor's documentation.