Cyberhaven vs GTB Technologies

A side-by-side comparison on deployment model, data residency, licensing basis and security coverage. Structural facts are verifiable against vendor documentation; the scored dimensions are our assessment.

CH

Cyberhaven

Cyberhaven

7.1

Average across eight dimensions

Deployment
SaaS only
Licensing
Per user
Time to value
Medium
Segment
Mid-market / enterprise
G2
GT

GTB Technologies

GTB Technologies

7.5

Average across eight dimensions

Deployment
Self-hosted
Licensing
Per endpoint or seat
Time to value
Complex
Segment
Mid-market / enterprise
G2

Score by dimension

Dimension CH GT
Data residency control 3 9.5
Pricing value 6 7
Detection accuracy 8.5 8
Response speed 8 8
Ease of setup 7.5 6.5
Management UX 8.5 6.5
Integration depth 7.5 6.5
Security coverage 8 8

Cyberhaven

  • +Traces data lineage rather than only matching content, so it catches transformed and renamed files
  • +Materially fewer false positives than pattern-matching approaches
  • +Investigation workflow shows the full path a file travelled
  • Cloud-delivered with no self-hosted deployment
  • Younger vendor with a smaller install base and less independent analyst coverage

Best for Organisations where intellectual property leaves via transformation rather than obvious copying

Watch out Assess vendor maturity and support depth alongside the technology

GTB Technologies

  • +Full on-premises deployment including air-gapped environments
  • +Inspects encrypted traffic at the network layer, which several competitors do not
  • +Covers endpoint, network and discovery from one platform
  • Interface and reporting are dated compared with the newer vendors here
  • Much smaller company, with correspondingly limited regional presence

Best for Regulated or isolated environments where cloud inspection is not permitted

Watch out Evaluate support responsiveness carefully given the vendor's size

Evaluate nPro yourself

Free for up to 99 agents, no time limit, no credit card. Deploys on your own infrastructure in minutes.

Other comparisons

Data last verified 2026-09-16. nPro publishes this comparison. Where nPro appears as one of the platforms listed, its card is marked and its scores are our own assessment. Third-party review scores are sourced from public vendor profiles. Structural facts — deployment model, licensing basis, residency — are verifiable against each vendor's documentation.

nPro AI

Online

Hi! I'm the nPro assistant. How can I help you learn about our SIEM & monitoring tools today?

Powered by nPro AI