Battlecards

Platform intelligence

Vendor-by-vendor breakdowns of the SIEM and XDR markets. Every platform scored on the same eight dimensions, with a dedicated page for each head-to-head pairing.

nPro publishes this comparison. Where nPro appears as one of the platforms listed, its card is marked and its scores are our own assessment. Third-party review scores are sourced from public vendor profiles. Structural facts are verifiable against each vendor's documentation: deployment model, licensing basis and residency.

XDR Platform Battlecard

15 vendors

XDR platforms pull endpoint, network, identity and cloud data into one set of detections. Most are built SaaS-first. That means your endpoint data sits in the vendor's cloud. If you have data residency rules, that is the first question to ask, not the last.

NP CS MD S1 PA TM SO CR TX BD EL WZ CI FT ES

Open battlecard →

SIEM Platform Battlecard

15 vendors

A SIEM's pricing model shapes your security more than its feature list does. Under per-gigabyte licensing, every new log source adds running cost. So teams quietly stop collecting the noisy sources. Those are the ones that make lateral movement visible. That is why this comparison leads with deployment model and licensing basis.

NP SP MS QR EL WZ GL SL EX SX DV R7 FS ME SO

Open battlecard →

Network Monitoring Battlecard

15 vendors

Network monitoring is the one category where self-hosting is still normal. So residency rarely separates these tools. What does is polling interval, licensing basis, and whether the tool can watch several sites without exposing them. A tool that polls every five minutes and charges per device quietly decides how much of your estate you watch.

NP ZB PR LN NG CM IC OB SW OM AU DD ND CA WU

Open battlecard →

Data Loss Prevention Battlecard

16 vendors

In DLP, the delivery model is itself a risk. DLP reads your most sensitive content by design. So a cloud product asks you to send a third party the very data you are protecting. Most of this market is now SaaS. That is why this table leads with deployment model. nPro DLP appears first and is marked as our own platform. Its email channel is detection only today, and the card says so.

NP FP SY MP TX DG NS ZS PP EP SF NF CH GT TM GW

Open battlecard →

How the scoring works

Data residency control	Derived from deployment model. Self-hosted with air-gap support scores highest.
Pricing value	Derived from licensing basis. Flat and free models score above volume-based.
The remaining six	Editorial assessment: ease of setup, management UX, detection accuracy, response speed, integration depth, security coverage.

Third-party review scores are sourced from public vendor profiles. Where no profile exists the field shows an em dash rather than an estimate.