Resources

Platform comparisons

How nPro compares against the platforms you are probably also evaluating — on deployment model, licensing basis, data residency and air-gap capability rather than feature checklists.

Category battlecards

XDR Platform Battlecard

15 vendors

XDR platforms pull endpoint, network, identity and cloud data into one set of detections. Most are built SaaS-first. That means your endpoint data sits in the vendor's cloud. If you have data residency rules, that is the first question to ask, not the last.

Open battlecard →

SIEM Platform Battlecard

15 vendors

A SIEM's pricing model shapes your security more than its feature list does. Under per-gigabyte licensing, every new log source adds running cost. So teams quietly stop collecting the noisy sources. Those are the ones that make lateral movement visible. That is why this comparison leads with deployment model and licensing basis.

Open battlecard →

Network Monitoring Battlecard

15 vendors

Network monitoring is the one category where self-hosting is still normal. So residency rarely separates these tools. What does is polling interval, licensing basis, and whether the tool can watch several sites without exposing them. A tool that polls every five minutes and charges per device quietly decides how much of your estate you watch.

Open battlecard →

Data Loss Prevention Battlecard

16 vendors

In DLP, the delivery model is itself a risk. DLP reads your most sensitive content by design. So a cloud product asks you to send a third party the very data you are protecting. Most of this market is now SaaS. That is why this table leads with deployment model. nPro DLP appears first and is marked as our own platform. Its email channel is detection only today, and the card says so.

Open battlecard →

Head-to-head pages

Where to start