Bitdefender GravityZone XDR vs Cybereason XDR

A side-by-side comparison on deployment model, data residency, licensing basis and security coverage. Structural facts are verifiable against vendor documentation; the scored dimensions are our assessment.

BD

Bitdefender GravityZone XDR

Bitdefender

8.1

Average across eight dimensions

Deployment
Hybrid
Licensing
Per endpoint
Time to value
Medium
Segment
SMB / mid-market / enterprise
G2
4.1 (108)
CR

Cybereason XDR

LevelBlue

7.6

Average across eight dimensions

Deployment
Hybrid
Licensing
Per endpoint
Time to value
Medium
Segment
Mid-market / enterprise
G2
4.4 (18)

Score by dimension

Dimension BD CR
Data residency control 6.5 6
Pricing value 7.5 6.5
Detection accuracy 9 8.5
Response speed 8.5 8.5
Ease of setup 8 7
Management UX 8 8
Integration depth 8.5 8
Security coverage 9 8.5

What the comparison says

Both platforms are hybrid, so deployment model is not what separates them here. Bitdefender GravityZone XDR is described as medium to reach value, against medium for Cybereason XDR.

Bitdefender GravityZone XDR licenses on per endpoint, Cybereason XDR on per endpoint. Neither bills on data volume, so the comparison is about what each licence includes rather than how much you send it.

Bitdefender GravityZone XDR leads on pricing value and ease of setup, and Cybereason XDR does not lead by a clear margin anywhere in this set.

Bitdefender GravityZone XDR

  • +Consistently top results in AV-TEST and AV-Comparatives independent testing.
  • +On-premises GravityZone deployment available, unlike most XDR vendors here.
  • +One platform covers endpoints, servers, virtual machines and cloud workloads.
  • −Console navigation flagged as complex by a meaningful share of reviewers.
  • −Deep scans can affect performance on older endpoint hardware.

Best for Organisations wanting proven detection with an on-premises management option.

Watch out Verify which XDR features are available in the on-premises build specifically.

Cybereason XDR

  • +Malop attack-chain view is genuinely strong for investigation workflow.
  • +On-premises deployment has historically been available, which is unusual in this category.
  • +Behavioural detection performs well against fileless and living-off-the-land techniques.
  • −Acquired by LevelBlue (an MSSP) in November 2025. Confirm the standalone product roadmap before committing.
  • −Limited partner and support presence across Southeast Asia.

Best for Teams wanting strong investigation UX with an on-premises option.

Watch out Confirm current on-premises feature parity. It has historically trailed the SaaS build.

Evaluate nPro yourself

Free for up to 30 agents, no time limit, no credit card. Deploys on your own infrastructure in minutes.

Read the documentation Talk to an engineer All 15 platforms →

More Bitdefender GravityZone XDR comparisons

BD vs NP BD vs CS BD vs MD BD vs S1 BD vs PA BD vs TM BD vs SO BD vs TX BD vs EL BD vs WZ BD vs CI BD vs FT BD vs ES

More Cybereason XDR comparisons

CR vs NP CR vs CS CR vs MD CR vs S1 CR vs PA CR vs TM CR vs SO CR vs TX CR vs EL CR vs WZ CR vs CI CR vs FT CR vs ES

Data last verified 2026-10-06. nPro publishes this comparison. Where nPro appears as one of the platforms listed, its card is marked and its scores are our own assessment. Third-party review scores are sourced from public vendor profiles. Structural facts are verifiable against each vendor's documentation: deployment model, licensing basis and residency.