Bitdefender GravityZone XDR vs SentinelOne Singularity

A side-by-side comparison on deployment model, data residency, licensing basis and security coverage. Structural facts are verifiable against vendor documentation; the scored dimensions are our assessment.

BD

Bitdefender GravityZone XDR

Bitdefender

8.1

Average across eight dimensions

Deployment
Hybrid
Licensing
Per endpoint
Time to value
Medium
Segment
SMB / mid-market / enterprise
G2
4.1 (108)
S1

SentinelOne Singularity

SentinelOne

8.0

Average across eight dimensions

Deployment
Hybrid
Licensing
Per endpoint
Time to value
Medium
Segment
Mid-market / enterprise
G2
4.7 (213)

Score by dimension

Dimension BD S1
Data residency control 6.5 4.5
Pricing value 7.5 6
Detection accuracy 9 9.5
Response speed 8.5 9.5
Ease of setup 8 7.5
Management UX 8 8.5
Integration depth 8.5 9
Security coverage 9 9.5

What the comparison says

Both platforms are hybrid, so deployment model is not what separates them here. Bitdefender GravityZone XDR is described as medium to reach value, against medium for SentinelOne Singularity.

Bitdefender GravityZone XDR licenses on per endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity on per endpoint. Neither bills on data volume, so the comparison is about what each licence includes rather than how much you send it.

Bitdefender GravityZone XDR leads on residency and pricing value. SentinelOne Singularity leads on response speed.

Bitdefender GravityZone XDR

  • +Consistently top results in AV-TEST and AV-Comparatives independent testing.
  • +On-premises GravityZone deployment available, unlike most XDR vendors here.
  • +One platform covers endpoints, servers, virtual machines and cloud workloads.
  • −Console navigation flagged as complex by a meaningful share of reviewers.
  • −Deep scans can affect performance on older endpoint hardware.

Best for Organisations wanting proven detection with an on-premises management option.

Watch out Verify which XDR features are available in the on-premises build specifically.

SentinelOne Singularity

  • +Autonomous containment without waiting for analyst intervention.
  • +One-click rollback reverses ransomware file encryption on the endpoint.
  • +Purple AI supports natural-language threat hunting across telemetry.
  • −Licensing model is complex. Validate per-seat versus capacity carefully.
  • −On-premises availability has varied by release and region; confirm before shortlisting.

Best for Teams wanting automated response without building the automation themselves.

Watch out Confirm current self-hosted availability directly. Do not assume from older documentation.

Evaluate nPro yourself

Free for up to 30 agents, no time limit, no credit card. Deploys on your own infrastructure in minutes.

Read the documentation Talk to an engineer All 15 platforms →

More Bitdefender GravityZone XDR comparisons

BD vs NP BD vs CS BD vs MD BD vs PA BD vs TM BD vs SO BD vs CR BD vs TX BD vs EL BD vs WZ BD vs CI BD vs FT BD vs ES

More SentinelOne Singularity comparisons

S1 vs NP S1 vs CS S1 vs MD S1 vs PA S1 vs TM S1 vs SO S1 vs CR S1 vs TX S1 vs EL S1 vs WZ S1 vs CI S1 vs FT S1 vs ES

Data last verified 2026-10-06. nPro publishes this comparison. Where nPro appears as one of the platforms listed, its card is marked and its scores are our own assessment. Third-party review scores are sourced from public vendor profiles. Structural facts are verifiable against each vendor's documentation: deployment model, licensing basis and residency.