Cybereason XDR vs Wazuh

A side-by-side comparison on deployment model, data residency, licensing basis and security coverage. Structural facts are verifiable against vendor documentation; the scored dimensions are our assessment.

CR

Cybereason XDR

LevelBlue

7.6

Average across eight dimensions

Deployment
Hybrid
Licensing
Per endpoint
Time to value
Medium
Segment
Mid-market / enterprise
G2
4.4 (18)
WZ

Wazuh

Wazuh Inc.

8.0

Average across eight dimensions

Deployment
Self-hosted
Licensing
Free; paid support available
Time to value
Complex
Segment
SMB / mid-market
G2
4.5 (72)

Score by dimension

Dimension CR WZ
Data residency control 6 10
Pricing value 6.5 9.8
Detection accuracy 8.5 8
Response speed 8.5 7
Ease of setup 7 6
Management UX 8 6.5
Integration depth 8 8
Security coverage 8.5 8.5

What the comparison says

Cybereason XDR is hybrid and Wazuh is self-hosted. Where your obligations dictate residency, that difference tends to settle the choice before any score is read.

Cybereason XDR licenses on per endpoint, Wazuh on free; paid support available. Neither bills on data volume, so the comparison is about what each licence includes rather than how much you send it.

Cybereason XDR leads on response speed, ease of setup and management UX. Wazuh leads on residency and pricing value.

Cybereason XDR

  • +Malop attack-chain view is genuinely strong for investigation workflow.
  • +On-premises deployment has historically been available, which is unusual in this category.
  • +Behavioural detection performs well against fileless and living-off-the-land techniques.
  • −Acquired by LevelBlue (an MSSP) in November 2025. Confirm the standalone product roadmap before committing.
  • −Limited partner and support presence across Southeast Asia.

Best for Teams wanting strong investigation UX with an on-premises option.

Watch out Confirm current on-premises feature parity. It has historically trailed the SaaS build.

Wazuh

  • +Genuinely free and open source with no licence cost at any scale.
  • +Mature rule engine, file integrity monitoring and configuration assessment.
  • +Fully self-hosted and air-gap capable with a large community rule base.
  • −The surrounding stack is where the real cost lands: indexer, dashboards and storage.
  • −Operational burden falls entirely on your team unless a support contract is bought.

Best for Teams with platform engineering capacity and a strong preference for open source.

Watch out Budget for the indexing layer and the engineer who maintains it.

Evaluate nPro yourself

Free for up to 30 agents, no time limit, no credit card. Deploys on your own infrastructure in minutes.

Read the documentation Talk to an engineer All 15 platforms →

More Cybereason XDR comparisons

CR vs NP CR vs CS CR vs MD CR vs S1 CR vs PA CR vs TM CR vs SO CR vs TX CR vs BD CR vs EL CR vs CI CR vs FT CR vs ES

More Wazuh comparisons

WZ vs NP WZ vs CS WZ vs MD WZ vs S1 WZ vs PA WZ vs TM WZ vs SO WZ vs TX WZ vs BD WZ vs EL WZ vs CI WZ vs FT WZ vs ES

Data last verified 2026-10-06. nPro publishes this comparison. Where nPro appears as one of the platforms listed, its card is marked and its scores are our own assessment. Third-party review scores are sourced from public vendor profiles. Structural facts are verifiable against each vendor's documentation: deployment model, licensing basis and residency.