Endpoint Protector vs Microsoft Purview DLP
A side-by-side comparison on deployment model, data residency, licensing basis and security coverage. Structural facts are verifiable against vendor documentation; the scored dimensions are our assessment.
Endpoint Protector
Netwrix (CoSoSys)
7.8
Average across eight dimensions
- Deployment
- Self-hosted
- Licensing
- Per endpoint
- Time to value
- Fast
- Segment
- SMB / mid-market
- G2
- 4.5 (162)
Microsoft Purview DLP
Microsoft
7.2
Average across eight dimensions
- Deployment
- SaaS only
- Licensing
- M365 E5 Compliance tier
- Time to value
- Medium
- Segment
- Enterprise
- G2
- 4.6 (22)
Score by dimension
| Dimension | EP | MP |
|---|---|---|
| Data residency control | 9 | 2 |
| Pricing value | 7.5 | 8 |
| Detection accuracy | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| Response speed | 7.5 | 8 |
| Ease of setup | 8.5 | 8 |
| Management UX | 8 | 8 |
| Integration depth | 7 | 9 |
| Security coverage | 7.5 | 7.5 |
What the comparison says
Endpoint Protector is self-hosted and Microsoft Purview DLP is SaaS only. Where your obligations dictate residency, that difference tends to settle the choice before any score is read.
Endpoint Protector licenses on per endpoint, Microsoft Purview DLP on M365 E5 Compliance tier. Neither bills on data volume, so the comparison is about what each licence includes rather than how much you send it.
Endpoint Protector leads on residency. Microsoft Purview DLP leads on integrations.
Endpoint Protector
- +Deploys as a virtual appliance you run yourself, so you keep genuine residency control.
- +Cross-platform agents for Windows, macOS and Linux, which is unusual in this category.
- +Among the fastest platforms here to get to a working policy.
- −Content classification is less sophisticated than the enterprise engines.
- −Cloud and SaaS channel coverage is limited compared with the SASE vendors.
Best for SMB and mid-market needing self-hosted device control and endpoint DLP.
Watch out Strong on device control, lighter on deep content inspection. Match that to your risk.
Microsoft Purview DLP
- +Effectively included for organisations already licensed for M365 E5 Compliance.
- +Native coverage of Exchange, SharePoint, OneDrive and Teams with no connectors to build.
- +Policies follow the label, so classification and protection stay attached to the file.
- −Coverage outside the Microsoft estate is thin. Third-party SaaS and non-Windows endpoints lag.
- −No on-premises option; inspection happens in Microsoft's cloud.
Best for Microsoft-centric organisations whose sensitive data lives in M365.
Watch out If material data sits outside Microsoft, this leaves real gaps.
Evaluate nPro yourself
Free for up to 30 agents, no time limit, no credit card. Deploys on your own infrastructure in minutes.
More Endpoint Protector comparisons
More Microsoft Purview DLP comparisons
Data last verified 2026-10-06. nPro publishes this comparison. Where nPro appears as one of the platforms listed, its card is marked and its scores are our own assessment. Third-party review scores are sourced from public vendor profiles. Structural facts are verifiable against each vendor's documentation: deployment model, licensing basis and residency.