Endpoint Protector vs nPro DLP
A side-by-side comparison on deployment model, data residency, licensing basis and security coverage. Structural facts are verifiable against vendor documentation; the scored dimensions are our assessment.
Endpoint Protector
Netwrix (CoSoSys)
7.8
Average across eight dimensions
- Deployment
- Self-hosted
- Licensing
- Per endpoint
- Time to value
- Fast
- Segment
- SMB / mid-market
- G2
- 4.5 (162)
nPro DLP
NPRO TECH Sdn. Bhd.
7.9
Average across eight dimensions
- Deployment
- Self-hosted
- Licensing
- $4.50/agent/mo
- Time to value
- Fast
- Segment
- Mid-market / regulated enterprise
- G2
- —
Score by dimension
| Dimension | EP | NP |
|---|---|---|
| Data residency control | 9 | 10 |
| Pricing value | 7.5 | 9 |
| Detection accuracy | 7.5 | 7 |
| Response speed | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| Ease of setup | 8.5 | 9 |
| Management UX | 8 | 7.5 |
| Integration depth | 7 | 6 |
| Security coverage | 7.5 | 7.5 |
What the comparison says
Both platforms are self-hosted, so deployment model is not what separates them here. Endpoint Protector is described as fast to reach value, against fast for nPro DLP.
Endpoint Protector licenses on per endpoint, nPro DLP on $4.50/agent/mo. Neither bills on data volume, so the comparison is about what each licence includes rather than how much you send it.
Endpoint Protector leads on integrations. nPro DLP leads on residency and pricing value.
Endpoint Protector
- +Deploys as a virtual appliance you run yourself, so you keep genuine residency control.
- +Cross-platform agents for Windows, macOS and Linux, which is unusual in this category.
- +Among the fastest platforms here to get to a working policy.
- −Content classification is less sophisticated than the enterprise engines.
- −Cloud and SaaS channel coverage is limited compared with the SASE vendors.
Best for SMB and mid-market needing self-hosted device control and endpoint DLP.
Watch out Strong on device control, lighter on deep content inspection. Match that to your risk.
nPro DLP
- +Inspection runs on your own infrastructure, so the content you protect never goes to a third party.
- +Included in the same $4.50 per-agent price as XDR, SIEM and EMS, with no metering on content scanned.
- +Regional detectors for NRIC, KTP and NPWP, with checksum validation and Malay keyword matching.
- −Email is detection only today. Inline blocking needs a mail gateway and is the next phase.
- −Launched in September 2026, so it has a far shorter track record than every other platform here.
Best for Regulated organisations in Malaysia and Indonesia that cannot send sensitive content to a cloud service for inspection.
Watch out New to market and email is monitor-only. Start in Monitor mode and pilot before relying on enforcement.
Evaluate nPro yourself
Free for up to 30 agents, no time limit, no credit card. Deploys on your own infrastructure in minutes.
More Endpoint Protector comparisons
More nPro DLP comparisons
Data last verified 2026-10-06. nPro publishes this comparison. Where nPro appears as one of the platforms listed, its card is marked and its scores are our own assessment. Third-party review scores are sourced from public vendor profiles. Structural facts are verifiable against each vendor's documentation: deployment model, licensing basis and residency.