Datadog Network Monitoring vs WhatsUp Gold
A side-by-side comparison on deployment model, data residency, licensing basis and security coverage. Structural facts are verifiable against vendor documentation; the scored dimensions are our assessment.
Datadog Network Monitoring
Datadog
6.8
Average across eight dimensions
- Deployment
- SaaS only
- Licensing
- Per host + flow volume
- Time to value
- Fast
- Segment
- Mid-market / enterprise
- G2
- —
WhatsUp Gold
Progress Software
7.1
Average across eight dimensions
- Deployment
- Self-hosted
- Licensing
- Points / per device
- Time to value
- Fast
- Segment
- SMB / mid-market
- G2
- 4.4 (388)
Score by dimension
| Dimension | DD | WU |
|---|---|---|
| Data residency control | 2 | 8.5 |
| Pricing value | 3.5 | 6 |
| Detection accuracy | 8 | 7 |
| Response speed | 8 | 7 |
| Ease of setup | 8 | 8 |
| Management UX | 9 | 7.5 |
| Integration depth | 9.5 | 7.5 |
| Security coverage | 6.5 | 5.5 |
What the comparison says
Datadog Network Monitoring is SaaS only and WhatsUp Gold is self-hosted. Where your obligations dictate residency, that difference tends to settle the choice before any score is read.
Datadog Network Monitoring licenses on per host + flow volume, WhatsUp Gold on points / per device. A basis tied to data volume bills you for visibility, which over time shapes how much you are willing to collect.
Datadog Network Monitoring leads on fault detection, alerting speed, management UX, integrations and device coverage. WhatsUp Gold leads on residency and pricing value.
Datadog Network Monitoring
- +Best-in-class dashboards and correlation with application and infrastructure telemetry.
- +Very large integration catalogue across cloud and on-premises sources.
- +Cloud Network Monitoring ties flow data to service dependencies.
- −SaaS only, and among the most expensive options once host and flow volume are counted.
- −Cost visibility is poor until the first full month's bill arrives.
Best for Cloud-native teams already standardised on Datadog for observability.
Watch out Model the bill against realistic host and flow volume before committing.
WhatsUp Gold
- +Straightforward setup with strong Layer 2 and Layer 3 discovery mapping.
- +Self-hosted with clear point-based licensing.
- +Good hybrid cloud and on-premises visibility in one view.
- −Windows server requirement limits it in Linux-first environments.
- −Point-based licensing and add-on modules make total cost harder to forecast.
Best for Windows-centric SMB and mid-market networks wanting commercial support.
Watch out Add up the modules you actually need. The base licence covers less than it appears.
Evaluate nPro yourself
Free for up to 30 agents, no time limit, no credit card. Deploys on your own infrastructure in minutes.
More Datadog Network Monitoring comparisons
More WhatsUp Gold comparisons
Data last verified 2026-10-06. nPro publishes this comparison. Where nPro appears as one of the platforms listed, its card is marked and its scores are our own assessment. Third-party review scores are sourced from public vendor profiles. Structural facts are verifiable against each vendor's documentation: deployment model, licensing basis and residency.