Datadog Network Monitoring vs SolarWinds NPM

A side-by-side comparison on deployment model, data residency, licensing basis and security coverage. Structural facts are verifiable against vendor documentation; the scored dimensions are our assessment.

DD

Datadog Network Monitoring

Datadog

6.8

Average across eight dimensions

Deployment
SaaS only
Licensing
Per host + flow volume
Time to value
Fast
Segment
Mid-market / enterprise
G2
—
SW

SolarWinds NPM

SolarWinds

7.5

Average across eight dimensions

Deployment
Self-hosted
Licensing
Per element
Time to value
Medium
Segment
Mid-market / enterprise
G2
—

Score by dimension

Dimension DD SW
Data residency control 2 8.5
Pricing value 3.5 4.5
Detection accuracy 8 8
Response speed 8 8
Ease of setup 8 7
Management UX 9 8.5
Integration depth 9.5 9
Security coverage 6.5 6.5

What the comparison says

Datadog Network Monitoring is SaaS only and SolarWinds NPM is self-hosted. Where your obligations dictate residency, that difference tends to settle the choice before any score is read.

Datadog Network Monitoring licenses on per host + flow volume, SolarWinds NPM on per element. A basis tied to data volume bills you for visibility, which over time shapes how much you are willing to collect.

Datadog Network Monitoring leads on ease of setup. SolarWinds NPM leads on residency and pricing value.

Datadog Network Monitoring

  • +Best-in-class dashboards and correlation with application and infrastructure telemetry.
  • +Very large integration catalogue across cloud and on-premises sources.
  • +Cloud Network Monitoring ties flow data to service dependencies.
  • −SaaS only, and among the most expensive options once host and flow volume are counted.
  • −Cost visibility is poor until the first full month's bill arrives.

Best for Cloud-native teams already standardised on Datadog for observability.

Watch out Model the bill against realistic host and flow volume before committing.

SolarWinds NPM

  • +Polished interface and mature topology mapping.
  • +Deep device support and a large module ecosystem across the Orion platform.
  • +Self-hosted, with strong enterprise reporting.
  • −Element-based licensing makes this among the most expensive options at scale.
  • −Reputational overhang from the 2020 supply chain compromise still features in security reviews.

Best for Enterprises wanting a polished commercial platform with broad device coverage.

Watch out Model element counts carefully, and expect security review questions about the vendor.

Evaluate nPro yourself

Free for up to 30 agents, no time limit, no credit card. Deploys on your own infrastructure in minutes.

Read the documentation Talk to an engineer All 15 platforms →

More Datadog Network Monitoring comparisons

DD vs NP DD vs ZB DD vs PR DD vs LN DD vs NG DD vs CM DD vs IC DD vs OB DD vs OM DD vs AU DD vs ND DD vs CA DD vs WU

More SolarWinds NPM comparisons

SW vs NP SW vs ZB SW vs PR SW vs LN SW vs NG SW vs CM SW vs IC SW vs OB SW vs OM SW vs AU SW vs ND SW vs CA SW vs WU

Data last verified 2026-10-06. nPro publishes this comparison. Where nPro appears as one of the platforms listed, its card is marked and its scores are our own assessment. Third-party review scores are sourced from public vendor profiles. Structural facts are verifiable against each vendor's documentation: deployment model, licensing basis and residency.