ESET Inspect vs Trellix XDR

A side-by-side comparison on deployment model, data residency, licensing basis and security coverage. Structural facts are verifiable against vendor documentation; the scored dimensions are our assessment.

ES

ESET Inspect

ESET

8.2

Average across eight dimensions

Deployment
Self-hosted
Licensing
Per endpoint
Time to value
Fast
Segment
SMB / mid-market
G2
—
TX

Trellix XDR

Trellix

7.4

Average across eight dimensions

Deployment
Hybrid
Licensing
Per endpoint
Time to value
Complex
Segment
Enterprise
G2
—

Score by dimension

Dimension ES TX
Data residency control 8 6.5
Pricing value 8 6
Detection accuracy 8.5 8
Response speed 8 8
Ease of setup 8.5 6.5
Management UX 8 7
Integration depth 8 8.5
Security coverage 8.5 8.5

What the comparison says

ESET Inspect is self-hosted and Trellix XDR is hybrid. Where your obligations dictate residency, that difference tends to settle the choice before any score is read.

ESET Inspect licenses on per endpoint, Trellix XDR on per endpoint. Neither bills on data volume, so the comparison is about what each licence includes rather than how much you send it.

ESET Inspect leads on residency, pricing value, ease of setup and management UX, and Trellix XDR does not lead by a clear margin anywhere in this set.

ESET Inspect

  • +On-premises ESET PROTECT server available. That is a genuine self-hosted control plane.
  • +Very low endpoint performance impact compared with most agents here.
  • +Strong false-positive control, which reduces analyst load meaningfully.
  • −Managed detection service is less mature than managed-first competitors.
  • −Advanced threat intelligence features require additional tiers.

Best for SMB and mid-market wanting self-hosted EDR with a light agent footprint.

Watch out ESET is folding the cloud Inspect console into ESET PROTECT through 2027. On-premises Inspect is unaffected, so specify the on-prem build.

Trellix XDR

  • +Hybrid deployment options including on-premises management.
  • +Broad existing install base in government and large enterprise.
  • +Strong network detection heritage from the FireEye side of the business.
  • −Post-merger product consolidation has made the portfolio harder to navigate.
  • −Management experience rated below newer platforms by most reviewers.

Best for Existing McAfee or FireEye estates consolidating onto one platform.

Watch out Clarify which components are current and which are in sunset before buying.

Evaluate nPro yourself

Free for up to 30 agents, no time limit, no credit card. Deploys on your own infrastructure in minutes.

Read the documentation Talk to an engineer All 15 platforms →

More ESET Inspect comparisons

ES vs NP ES vs CS ES vs MD ES vs S1 ES vs PA ES vs TM ES vs SO ES vs CR ES vs BD ES vs EL ES vs WZ ES vs CI ES vs FT

More Trellix XDR comparisons

TX vs NP TX vs CS TX vs MD TX vs S1 TX vs PA TX vs TM TX vs SO TX vs CR TX vs BD TX vs EL TX vs WZ TX vs CI TX vs FT

Data last verified 2026-10-06. nPro publishes this comparison. Where nPro appears as one of the platforms listed, its card is marked and its scores are our own assessment. Third-party review scores are sourced from public vendor profiles. Structural facts are verifiable against each vendor's documentation: deployment model, licensing basis and residency.