Auvik vs Cacti
A side-by-side comparison on deployment model, data residency, licensing basis and security coverage. Structural facts are verifiable against vendor documentation; the scored dimensions are our assessment.
Auvik
Auvik Networks
6.5
Average across eight dimensions
- Deployment
- SaaS only
- Licensing
- Per billable device
- Time to value
- Fast
- Segment
- SMB / MSP
- G2
- —
Cacti
The Cacti Group
6.7
Average across eight dimensions
- Deployment
- Self-hosted
- Licensing
- Free
- Time to value
- Medium
- Segment
- SMB / education
- G2
- —
Score by dimension
| Dimension | AU | CA |
|---|---|---|
| Data residency control | 2 | 10 |
| Pricing value | 5.5 | 9.8 |
| Detection accuracy | 7 | 6 |
| Response speed | 7 | 5.5 |
| Ease of setup | 9 | 6 |
| Management UX | 8.5 | 5.5 |
| Integration depth | 7.5 | 6 |
| Security coverage | 5.5 | 4.5 |
Auvik
- +Fastest time to value of anything in this table — a collector and you are running
- +Automated topology mapping and configuration backup are genuinely strong
- +Multi-tenant model is purpose-built for managed service providers
- −SaaS only — network data leaves your environment, which rules it out under residency constraints
- −Per-billable-device pricing adds up across large or device-dense estates
Best for MSPs wanting fast multi-client onboarding with no infrastructure to run
Watch out No self-hosted option at all — a hard stop for regulated or air-gapped networks
Cacti
- +Free, stable and extremely light on resources
- +Long-established SNMP graphing with a large body of community templates
- +Runs happily on modest hardware in small or isolated environments
- −Graphing-first: alerting requires plugins and is not a core strength
- −Interface and workflow are dated, and development pace is slow
Best for Small or isolated networks needing long-term interface graphing at no cost
Watch out Treat this as a graphing tool rather than a monitoring and alerting platform
Evaluate nPro yourself
Free for up to 99 agents, no time limit, no credit card. Deploys on your own infrastructure in minutes.
Other comparisons
Data last verified 2026-09-16. nPro publishes this comparison. Where nPro appears as one of the platforms listed, its card is marked and its scores are our own assessment. Third-party review scores are sourced from public vendor profiles. Structural facts — deployment model, licensing basis, residency — are verifiable against each vendor's documentation.